Many disjoint dense subgraphs versus large k-connected subgraphs in large graphs with given edge density
نویسندگان
چکیده
It is proved that every graph with edge density at least d + k and sufficiently many vertices contains a k-connected subgraph on at least t (t ≥ k+1) vertices, or s pairwise disjoint subgraphs with edge density at least d. By a classical result of Mader [11] this implies that every graph with edge density at least 3k and sufficiently many vertices contains a k-connected subgraph with at least r vertices, or r pairwise disjoint k-connected subgraphs. Another classical result of Mader [10] states that for every n there is an l(n) such that every graph with edge density at least l(n) contains a minor isomorphic to Kn. Recently, it was proved in [1] that every ( 31 2 a+1)-connected graph with sufficiently many vertices either has a topological minor isomorphic to Ka,pq, or it has a minor isomorphic to the disjoint union of p copies of Ka,q. Combining these results with the main result of the present note shows that every graph with edge density at least l(a) + ( 31 2 a+ 1) and sufficiently many vertices has a topological minor isomorphic to Ka,pa, or a minor isomorphic to the disjoint union of p copies of Ka. This implies an affirmative answer to a question of Fon-der-Flaass. ∗Research of this author is supported in part by the NSF grant DMS-0400498 and grant 03-01-00796 of the Russian Foundation for Fundamental Research
منابع مشابه
Conditions for families of disjoint k-connected subgraphs in a graph
In [Many disjoint dense subgraphs versus large k-connected subgraphs in large graphs with given edge density, Discrete Math. 309 (2009), 997–1000.], Böhme and Kostochka showed that every large enough graph with sufficient edge density contains either a kconnected subgraph of order at least r or a family of r vertex-disjoint k-connected subgraphs. Motivated by this, in this note we explore the l...
متن کاملDistinct edge geodetic decomposition in graphs
Let G=(V,E) be a simple connected graph of order p and size q. A decomposition of a graph G is a collection π of edge-disjoint subgraphs G_1,G_2,…,G_n of G such that every edge of G belongs to exactly one G_i,(1≤i ≤n). The decomposition 〖π={G〗_1,G_2,…,G_n} of a connected graph G is said to be a distinct edge geodetic decomposition if g_1 (G_i )≠g_1 (G_j ),(1≤i≠j≤n). The maximum cardinality of π...
متن کاملFast Hierarchy Construction for Dense Subgraphs
Discovering dense subgraphs and understanding the relations among them is a fundamental problem in graph mining. We want to not only identify dense subgraphs, but also build a hierarchy among them (e.g., larger but sparser subgraphs formed by two smaller dense subgraphs). Peeling algorithms (k-core, k-truss, and nucleus decomposition) have been effective to locate many dense subgraphs. However,...
متن کاملForcing highly connected subgraphs
By a theorem of Mader [5], highly connected subgraphs can be forced in finite graphs by assuming a high minimum degree. Solving a problem of Diestel [2], we extend this result to infinite graphs. Here, it is necessary to require not only high degree for the vertices but also high vertex-degree (or multiplicity) for the ends of the graph, i.e. a large number of disjoint rays in each end. We give...
متن کاملTOTAL DOMINATION POLYNOMIAL OF GRAPHS FROM PRIMARY SUBGRAPHS
Let $G = (V, E)$ be a simple graph of order $n$. The total dominating set is a subset $D$ of $V$ that every vertex of $V$ is adjacent to some vertices of $D$. The total domination number of $G$ is equal to minimum cardinality of total dominating set in $G$ and denoted by $gamma_t(G)$. The total domination polynomial of $G$ is the polynomial $D_t(G,x)=sum d_t(G,i)$, where $d_t(G,i)$ is the numbe...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Discrete Mathematics
دوره 309 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009